The clock starts when you file.Start free →
ROW30
Airport data

TUL performance data

Tulsa International (TUL, Tulsa OK) boarded 1627181 passengers in CY2024, up 3.5% vs 2023 — #83 nationally.

We hold 12 validated statistics for this airport, covering 1988 to 2024.

What this does not meanThis airport’s figures span 1 January 2018, when the DOT changed both which carriers must report (from 1% to half of one percent of domestic scheduled passenger revenue) and how flights are attributed (from the operating carrier to the marketing carrier). Figures either side of that date describe different populations of flights, so they are listed by year below rather than drawn as one continuous trend.

Traffic and reliability

  • Tulsa International (TUL, Tulsa OK) boarded 1627181 passengers in CY2024, up 3.5% vs 2023 — #83 nationally.

    2024complete FAA enplanement census

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2013, 1.74% of 20051 departures were cancelled and 19.1% left 15+ min late.

    2013n=20051 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2010, 1.79% of 20366 departures were cancelled and 15.2% left 15+ min late.

    2010n=20366 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2009, 1.73% of 20786 departures were cancelled and 14.6% left 15+ min late.

    2009n=20786 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2008, 1.54% of 23459 departures were cancelled and 18.3% left 15+ min late.

    2008n=23459 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2007, 2.8% of 25182 departures were cancelled and 19.3% left 15+ min late.

    2007n=25182 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2006, 1.75% of 21698 departures were cancelled and 19.4% left 15+ min late.

    2006n=21698 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2005, 1.34% of 22001 departures were cancelled and 17.0% left 15+ min late.

    2005n=22001 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2004, 1.83% of 21480 departures were cancelled and 17.4% left 15+ min late.

    2004n=21480 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 2003, 1.67% of 21850 departures were cancelled and 12.9% left 15+ min late.

    2003n=21850 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 1989, 0.76% of 23777 departures were cancelled and 16.9% left 15+ min late.

    1989n=23777 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

  • At TUL (Tulsa, OK) in 1988, 0.77% of 25423 departures were cancelled and 12.4% left 15+ min late.

    1988n=25423 departures

    Reporting carriers only; weather mix varies by region.

What this page does not tell you

  • Cancellation and delay rates are not directly comparable between airports. Route networks differ and so does the weather they fly through, and the source data says so.
  • Nothing here tells you what you are owed. That depends on the rule that applies to your situation, which is on the passenger rights pages.
  • These are counts and rates, not explanations. We have not tested why any figure moved.

Sources and provenance

Written by Row30 Data Desk. Data reviewed by Row30 Data Desk on July 26, 2026.

Underlying federal data covers 1988 to 2024.

Every figure above traces to a row in our statistics database: traffic-TUL-2024. Each was validated against its source row before this page could publish.

Found an error? Tell us and it goes in the public log.

How this article was produced

Produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a named human before publishing. The pipeline that pulls the federal data and computes the statistics is conventional software, not a language model. Software is never credited as an author.

Before a page can publish, an automated check matches every number in the draft against the stored source row. If a digit does not reconcile, the article is blocked. The same check confirms the period is stated, the citation is carried verbatim, the licence permits the use, and no comparative claim outruns its stated uncertainty.

How the Row30 Data Desk works, including what it is not.

Our full editorial standards are on the editorial guidelines page.

Source: Federal Aviation Administration passenger boarding data; analysis by Row30.

Source: U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics; analysis by Row30.